🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be settled by military means. He asserted the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be respected."

"In case they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the same tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."